9/11/01-Bush Looked The Other Way
Wake-Up Call, by Kristen Breitweiser
The Political Education of a 9/11 Widow
Page 116
"On the morning of September 12, 2001, the New York Times reported that the FBI agents descended on flight schools, neighborhoods,and restaurants in pursuit of leads. Within hours of the attacks, FBI agents were at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University seeking information. According to the Times, federal agents were dispatched to a store in Bangor, Maine, again hours after the attacks, to run down details of a phone conversation that had occurrred a week prior to the attacks. Five Arab men had tried to rent cell phones in a store in Banger. they were refused for lack of identification, but when $3,000 was put on the table, the phones were theirs. Howe had the FBI gotten this information so fast? How were they able to know the content of a telephone call that had transpired three weeks before 9/11, a time when, according to officials, the hijackers were operating under the radar? Had somebody recorded the conversation? If so, why? I asked, "Had any of the hijackers been under active and ongoing surveillance?"
"There were allegations that the hijackers ran practice runs on the airline routes that were chosen for the September 11 attacks. I asked, "Had any intelligence agents been shadowing the hijackers on practice runs?" I wondered whether any of our intelligence agents were killed on the planes. Where were the complete flight lists?"
"The New York Times also reported in that same article on September 12 that the authorities had already identified accomplices in several cities who had been involved in planning the attacks the day before. Authorities had also prepared biographies of each of the identifed members of the hijacking teams and had been tracing their recent movements."
"How was all of this information produced and gathered to-gether on such short notice? How was an FBI that was apparently so totally inept on September 10, 2001, so completely on the mark on September 12, 2001? The only logical explanation was that the hijackers were under surveillance by our intelligence community before 9/11. And if so, by whom? More important, if the hijackers had been under active intelligence community surveillance, why weren't they stopped?"
....."I wasn't interested in blame or politics. All I wanted was accountability."
NOTE: Mrs. Breitweiser's husband was a Republican
**************************************************************
REASONS TO INVADE COUNTRIES
BUSH NEEDED 9/11,TO INVADE AFGANISTAN, FOR THE HALLIBURTON PIPELINE DEAL. BUSH NEEDED 9/11 TO CONTROL IRAQ'S OIL.
The Political Education of a 9/11 Widow
Page 116
"On the morning of September 12, 2001, the New York Times reported that the FBI agents descended on flight schools, neighborhoods,and restaurants in pursuit of leads. Within hours of the attacks, FBI agents were at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University seeking information. According to the Times, federal agents were dispatched to a store in Bangor, Maine, again hours after the attacks, to run down details of a phone conversation that had occurrred a week prior to the attacks. Five Arab men had tried to rent cell phones in a store in Banger. they were refused for lack of identification, but when $3,000 was put on the table, the phones were theirs. Howe had the FBI gotten this information so fast? How were they able to know the content of a telephone call that had transpired three weeks before 9/11, a time when, according to officials, the hijackers were operating under the radar? Had somebody recorded the conversation? If so, why? I asked, "Had any of the hijackers been under active and ongoing surveillance?"
"There were allegations that the hijackers ran practice runs on the airline routes that were chosen for the September 11 attacks. I asked, "Had any intelligence agents been shadowing the hijackers on practice runs?" I wondered whether any of our intelligence agents were killed on the planes. Where were the complete flight lists?"
"The New York Times also reported in that same article on September 12 that the authorities had already identified accomplices in several cities who had been involved in planning the attacks the day before. Authorities had also prepared biographies of each of the identifed members of the hijacking teams and had been tracing their recent movements."
"How was all of this information produced and gathered to-gether on such short notice? How was an FBI that was apparently so totally inept on September 10, 2001, so completely on the mark on September 12, 2001? The only logical explanation was that the hijackers were under surveillance by our intelligence community before 9/11. And if so, by whom? More important, if the hijackers had been under active intelligence community surveillance, why weren't they stopped?"
....."I wasn't interested in blame or politics. All I wanted was accountability."
NOTE: Mrs. Breitweiser's husband was a Republican
**************************************************************
REASONS TO INVADE COUNTRIES
BUSH NEEDED 9/11,TO INVADE AFGANISTAN, FOR THE HALLIBURTON PIPELINE DEAL. BUSH NEEDED 9/11 TO CONTROL IRAQ'S OIL.

<< Home